Differences in Reading by the Economic Status of Texas Grade 4 Boys and Girls in Special Education: A Multiyear Statewide Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v2i1.40Keywords:
Special Education, Reading Achievement, Economic Status, Gender, DisabilitiesAbstract
In this investigation, the degree to which the economic status (i.e., Not Economically Disadvantaged, Economically Disadvantaged) of Texas Grade 4 boys and girls in special education was related to their reading performance was addressed. Archival data from the Texas Education Agency Public Education Information Management System were analyzed for 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 school years on the Texas state-mandated reading assessment for Grade 4 students. Inferential statistical analyses, conducted separately for boys and girls in special education, revealed that boys and girls in poverty had statistically significantly lower reading test scores than boys and girls who were not in poverty. Results in all four school years were consistent with the existing research literature in that poverty negatively affects reading performance. Implications for policy and practice were provided, as well as recommendations for future research.
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Educational Disparities. (2012). Ethnic and racial disparities in education: Psychology’s contributions to understand and reducing disparities. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ed/resources/racial-disparities.
Burney, V. H., & Beilke, J. R. (2008). The constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 171-197.
Carpenter, D., Ramirez, A., & Severn, L. (2006). Gaps or gaps: Challenging the singular definition of the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 39(1), 113-127.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Harris, L. V. (2018). Differences in the reading performance of Texas Grade 4 students as a function of their economic status, gender, and ethnicity/race: A multiyear, statewide investigation. Doctoral Dissertation, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
Harris, L. V., & Slate, J. R. (2017). Differences in reading by the economic status of Grade 3 Black boys and girls. Annal of Language and Literature, 1(2), 20-27.
Hernandez, D. J. (2012). Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, G., Ostojic, D., Menard, J., Picard, E., & Miller, C. J. (2017). Primary prevention of reading failure: Effect of universal peer tutoring at early grades. Journal of Edecuational Research, 110(2), 171-176. http://dx.doi.org/10/1080/00220671.2015.1060929.
Lee, K. M., & Slate, J. R. (2014). Differences in advanced achievement outcomes for Texas students as a function of economic disadvanatge. Journal of Education Research, 8(3), 137-149.
McGown, J. A. (2016). Differences in reading performance of Texas elementary school students as a function of their economic status, gender, and ethnicity/race: A multiyear statewide study. Doctoral Dissertation, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019a). Children and Youth with Disabilities. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019b). Fast Facts: Title 1. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=158.
National Center for Children in Poverty. (2019). Texas demographics of poor children. Retrieved from http://www.nccp.org/profiles/TX_profile_7.html.
Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to American’s public schools. New York: NY: Knopf.
Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor. New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91-116). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Schleeter, G. (2017). Differences in the reading achievement of Texas Grade 3 English Language Learners as a function of their economic status, ethnicity/race, and gender: A multiyear statewide study (Doctoral dissertation).
Texas Education Agency. (2011). STAAR Grade 4 Reading Assessment: Eligible Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147488114.
Texas Education Agency. (2018c). Enrollment in Texas Public Schools 2017-18. Austin, TX: Author.
United States Department of Agriculture. (2017). The cost of raising a child. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2017/01/13/cost-raising-child.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2019). Poverty guidelines. Retrieved from https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty-guidelines.
Wright, L. A., & Slate, J. R. (2015). Differences in critical thinking skills for Texas middle school students as a function of economic disadvantage. Journal of Education Research, 9(4), 345-356.
