Smartphone Learning Media Prototype Model Based on SAC (Smart Apps Creator) For 4.0 Learning

Authors

  • Jerry Puspitasari Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Juhadi Juhadi Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Suyahmo Suyahmo Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Pradika Adi Wijayanto Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Nuris Saadah Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v3i1.75

Keywords:

Learning, Smartphone, Smart Apps Creator, Learning 4.0

Abstract

Smartphone-based learning media is an alternative for developing learning media that can infiltrate the limitations of space and time. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of smartphone media for learning in the 4.0 era from media developed using the SAC (Smart Apps Creator) application. This research and development type uses the Hannafin & Peck design model. The research subjects used a purposive sample technique from 35 students of class XI IPS 3 SMA Jepon, Blora Regency, Central Java. Data analysis using Mixed Methods, data obtained by filling out checklists, questionnaires, and filled tests to conclude its effectiveness. Based on the research results, SAC (Smart Apps Creator) media is fun, easy to understand, interesting, practical, and not boring. The level of complete learning reached 91.4%. Students become accustomed to using technology 4.0 in learning, so they are expected to develop critical, creative, communicative, and collaborative thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, M. W. (2011). Michael Allen's 2012 e-learning annual (Vol. 54). John Wiley & Sons.

Ambarwulan, D., & Muliyati, D. (2016). The Design of Augmented Reality Application as Learning Media Marker-Based for Android Smartphone. Journal of Research & Development of Physics Education, 2(1), 73-80.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., & Pintrich, P. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational outcomes: Complete edition. New York: Longman.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Boham, A., & Rondonuwu, S. A. 2017. Penggunaan Smartphone Dalam Menunjang Aktivitas Perkuliahan Oleh Mahasiswa Fispol Unsrat Manado. E-Journal Acta Diurna, VI (2), 1–15.

Darmawan, D. (2016). Mobile learning: Sebuah aplikasi teknologi pembelajaran.

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41(4), 47-56.

Gani, F. K., Wahyudi, R. F., & Hidayatullah, S. N. (2015). Controlling Windu shrimp quality using apriori algorithm through smartphone-based application. The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology (IJMSIT), (18), 49-54.

Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 10(2), 169-207.

Haryaka, U., Agus, F., & Kridalaksana, A. H. (2017). User satisfaction model for e-learning using smartphone. Procedia computer science, 116, 373-380.

Islamiyati, R. A. 2017. Pemanfaatan Handphone Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Ekonomi Di Sma A dan Sma B Jakarta Selatan. Skripsi.

Ismanto, E., Novalia, M., & Herlandy, P. B. (2017). Pemanfaatan Smartphone Android Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bagi Guru Sma Negeri 2. Jurnal Untukmu Negeri, 1 (1), 42–47.

Karamina, S., Arsal, T., & Sanjoto, T. B. (2019). The Role of The Social Studies Teacher to Form Social Skills of Students in The Industry Era 4.0. 8 (2), 171–177.

Khoirudin, R., Ashadi, A., & Masykuri, M. (2021). Smart Apps Creator 3 to improve student learning outcomes during the pandemic of COVID-19. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) , 7(1), 25–34.

Laurillard, D. (2007). Edagogical Forms For Mobile Learning In: Pachler, N. (Ed) (2007) Mobile Learning: Towards A Research Agenda. London: WLE Centre, IoE.

Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), 284-296.

Means, B. (1993). Using Technology to Support Education Reform. USA: United States Government Printing.

Musa, N., Herpratiwi, H., & Dwi Yulianti, D. (2019). The Development of the Material Teaching based Android in Teaching Chemistryat Senior High School Grade X of SMAN 2 BandarLampung.

Musyaroah, S., & Fajartia, M. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Android dengan menggunakan Aplikasi Adobe Flash CS 6 pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 6(2), 22–26.

Na, L., Chris, A., & Mulyawan, B. (2013). A combination of feature selection and co-occurrence matrix methods for leukocyte recognition system. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 5(12), 101-106.

Pebriani, F., Heliawati, L., & Ardianto, D. (2022). The Effect of STREAM-Based Teaching Materials Using Smart Apps Creator 3 on Students’ Scientific Literacy. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 2(1), 78–93.

Pramuda, A., Kuswanto, H., & Hadiati, S. (2019). Effect of Real-Time Physics Organizer Based Smartphone and Indigenous Technology to Students' Scientific Literacy Viewed from Gender Differences. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 253-270.

Pribadi, B.A. 2009. Model Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Putranta, H., & Setiyatna, H. (2021). The Effect of Smartphones Usability on High School Students' Science Literacy Ability in Physics Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1383-1396.

Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, S., Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 89-107.

Rogozin. (2012). Physics Learning Instruments of XXI Century. Proceedings of The World Conference on Physics Education 2012.

Sarker, I. H. (2019). Context-aware rule learning from smartphone data: survey, challenges and future directions. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1-25.

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 299-323.

Speckmann, B. (2008). compsci/projects/Master_Thesis_Benjamin_Speckmann. pdf, viewed 10 October 2016.

Sudibjo, N., Idawati, L., & Harsanti, H. R. (2019, December). Characteristics of Learning in the Era of Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0. In International Conference on Education Technology (ICoET 2019) (pp. 276-278). Atlantis Press.

Sugiyono, D. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanti, Y., Syahri, I., Negeri, S., & Selatan, O. (2022). Improving The Motivation And Listening Ability Of Eleventh Grade Students By Using Smart App Creator. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 5(2), 247–251.

Syahputra, F. K., & Prismana, I. G. L. P. E. (n.d.). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Android 3D Kelas Xi di SMKN 1 Driyorejo Gresik. Jurnal IT-Edu (Information Technology and Education), 5(2), 763–768.

Tegeh, et al. 2014. Model Penelitian Pengembangan.Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Widiati, U., & Hayati, N. (2015). Teacher professional education in Indonesia and ASEAN 2015: Lessons learned from English language teacher education programs. ASEAN integration and the role of English language teaching, 3(1), 121-148.

Wijayanto, P. A., Rizal, M. F., Subekti, E. A. K. E., & Novianti, T. A. (2018). Pentingnya Pengembangan Geography Virtual Laboratory (Geo V-Lab) sebagai Media Pembelajaran Litosfer. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori Dan Praktik, 3(2), 119–125.

Zarte, M., Wermann, J., Heeren, P., & Pechmann, A. (2019, July). Concept, challenges, and learning benefits developing an industry 4.0 learning factory with student projects. In 2019 IEEE 17th international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) (Vol. 1, pp. 1133-1138). IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Puspitasari, J. ., Juhadi, J., Suyahmo, S., Wijayanto, P. A. ., & Saadah, N. . (2022). Smartphone Learning Media Prototype Model Based on SAC (Smart Apps Creator) For 4.0 Learning. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 3(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v3i1.75

Issue

Section

Articles