Development of HOTS-Based Assessment Instruments for Evaluating Rhythmic Movement in Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Andi Kurniawan Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
  • Eges Triwahyuni Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
  • Ahmad Zaki Emyus Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v5i2.369

Keywords:

Instrument, HOTS, Evaluating

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of The importance of HOTS is one of the essential competencies that students must master in facing the challenges of 21st century education, so it is necessary for teachers to develop HOTS-based assessment instruments. The purpose of this study is (1) Describe validity HOTS-based assessment instruments as evaluating rhythmic movement in elementary schools; (2) Describes practicality and (3) Testing the effectiveness. The research used is 4-D model development research. The instruments used were questionnaires and tests. Based on the results of the research conducted, it was found that HOTS-based assessment instruments for evaluating rhythmic movement in elementary schools. The validity of the instrument is supported by expert assessment which shows that the instrument is in accordance with the objectives of the HOTS assessment. In addition, this instrument has been proven effective in improving students' understanding in significantly improving students' cognitive and psychomotor abilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adijaya, MA, Widiana, IW, Agung Parwata, I., & Suwela Antara, I. (2023). Bloom's Taxonomy Revision-Oriented Learning Activities to Improve Procedural Capabilities and Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.261.

Al-Gaseem, M., Bakkar, B., & Al-zoubı, S. (2020). Metacognitive thinking skills among talented science education students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 897-904.https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.707205.

Alkhatib, OJ (2019, March). A framework for implementing higher-order thinking skills (problem-solving, critical thinking, creative thinking, and decision-making) in engineering & humanities. In 2019 Advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET), (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Inggris: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Brookhart, SM (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. San Antonio: Ascd.

Chandio, M.T., Zafar, N., & Solangi, G.M. (2021). Bloom's Taxonomy: Reforming Pedagogy through Assessment. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1), 109-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v8i1.308.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. USA & Canada: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 24, 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

Drenoyianni, H., & Kourtis, P. (2022). Investigating the development of higher order thinking in an elementary classroom: results from a mixed methods study. Education, 3(13), 1-19.https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2148486.

Driana, E., & Ernawati, E. (2019). Teachers' understanding and Practices in Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills at Primary Schools. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education,1(2), 110-118.https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v1i2.233.

García-Hermoso, A., Alonso-Martínez, A.M., Ramírez-Vélez, R., Pérez-Sousa, M. Á., Ramírez-Campillo, R., & Izquierdo, M. (2020). Association of physical education with improvement of health-related physical fitness outcomes and fundamental motor skills among youths: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA pediatrics, 174(6).https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0223.

Hadzhikoleva, S., Hadzhikolev, E., & Kasakliev, N. (2019). Using peer assessment to enhance higher order thinking skills. TEM Journal, 8,(1), 242-247. DOI: 10.18421/TEM81-34.

Hikmawati, F. (2020). Research Methodology. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Jansen, T., & Möller, J. (2022). Teacher judgments in school exams: Influences of students' lower-order-thinking skills on the assessment of students' higher-order-thinking skills. Teaching and teacher education, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616.

Johnson, R.B., & Christensen, L.B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. New York: Sage publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=juYaEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT21&dq=jhnson,+R.B.,+%26+Christensen,+L.B.+(2024).Educational+research:+Quantitative,+qualitative,+and+mixed+approaches.+Sage+publications.&ots=3pDnykCqZU&sig=zf_MSCnChLOCm9dvB-1eERUwGTQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Kemdikbud. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Nomor 262/M/2022 Perubahan atas Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students' academic use of mobile technology and higher-order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3), 47.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047.

Masyhud, MS (2021). Educational Research Methods 7th Edition. Jember: Management and Education Professional Development Institute.

Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Research and development models. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Professional Development (JPPPI), 1(2), 29-35. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/436485-research-model-development-brief-literat-739d389a.pdf.

OECD. (2019). An OECD Learning Framework 2030. The Future of Education and Labor, 23-35.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26068-2_3.

Oktaviana, D., & Susiaty, UD (2020). Development of Test Instruments Based on Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy to Measure the Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills. JIPM: Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 21-29. http://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.5638.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/351426.

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, RD (2018). Teachers' Knowledge about Higher-Order Thinking Skills and Its Learning Strategies. Problems of Education in the 21st Century,76(2), 215-230. DOI:10.33225/pec/18.76.215.

Robert, L., Miller, M.D., & Gronlund, N.E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242393428_Measurement_and_Assessment_In_Teaching.

Schulz, H. W., & FitzPatrick, B. (2016). Teachers' understandings of critical and higher order thinking and what this means for their teaching and assessments. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 62(1), 61-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v62i1.56168.

Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A., & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill Assessment Instruments in Learning Indonesian History. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 545-552. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796.

Shanti, MRS, Istiyono, E., & Munadi, S. (2022). The Effectiveness of Learning to Improve Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(5), 1576-1587. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i5.7220.

Sugiyono. (2017). Educational research methods using quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, A. (2006). Research procedures: a practical approach. Jakarta: Publishers,134, 252.

Suharsimi, A. (2016). Basics of educational evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Urbina, J., & Monks, S. M. (2020). Validating assessment tools in simulation. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing.

Walid, A., Sajidan, S., Ramli, M., & Kusumah, RGT (2019). Construction of the assessment concept to measure students' high order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237-251.https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.528180.

Yudha, RP (2023). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instrument: Validity and Reliability Analysis with The Rasch Model. EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching‏‏‎, 12(1), 21-38. https://doi. org/10.24235/eduma.v12i1.9468.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive?. The journal of the learning sciences, 12(2), 145-181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1.

Zulfiani, Z., Permana Suwarna, I., Muin, A., Mulyati, T., & El Islami, RAZ (2023). Developing the MathSci 21st app: Enhancing higher-order thinking skills assessment in mathematics and science education within an Islamic context. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(8), 19-31. .https://doi. org/10.21833/ijaas,3.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-28

How to Cite

Kurniawan, A., Triwahyuni, E., & Emyus, A. Z. (2025). Development of HOTS-Based Assessment Instruments for Evaluating Rhythmic Movement in Elementary Schools . International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 5(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v5i2.369

Issue

Section

Articles