A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Concerning Policy Issues in Covid-19 Pandemic

  • The Thang Nguyen The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vietnam
  • Dinh-Hai Luong The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vietnam
  • Hong-Lien Nguyen The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vietnam
  • Thi-Phuong Thao Vu The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vietnam
  • Hoai-Thu Nguyen The Vietnam National Institute of Educational Sciences, Vietnam
Keywords: Bibliometric Analysis, COVID-19, Policy Studies, Research Themes

Abstract

This research analysed the studies of policy on issues related to COVID-19. The results show the most productive countries, the most frequently cited sources, the most co-occurred topics of studies concerning policy issues since the epidemic was a breakout at the beginning. The data in this research were collected from the Scopus database with two search terms, "COVID-19" and "policy" of the social science domain, and published from the first day of 2020 to the search time (September 10, 2020). The final dataset consists of 384 valid documents analysed by descriptive statistics, and co-occurrence analysis was applied in R. Among 46 countries, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, China, India, and Italy are the leading countries that published these studies. Almost all the funded scholars focused on Europe, the Americas, and Asia. The main topics of the articles are "working in COVID-19 period", "community health and social support," "using ICT in teaching and learning," "human rights." Within funded studies, four interesting topics are "social well-being," "ICT infrastructure," "agricultural policy," and "born-digital." This study presents the current situation of how studies concerning policy issues have been issued to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: a necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. High Education. 2020;10(3),16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16.

Autin, K. L., Blustein, D. L., Ali, S. R., & Garriott, P. O. (2020). Career Development Impacts of COVID-19: Practice and Policy Recommendations. Journal of Career Development, 0894845320944486.

Bahn, K., Cohen, J., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2020). A Feminist Perspective on COVID‐19 and the Value of Care Work Globally. Gender, Work & Organization.

Buheji M, da Costa Cunha K, Beka G, Mavric B, de Souza YL, da Costa Silva, et al. The extent of Covid-19 pandemic socio-economic impact on global poverty. A global integrative, multidisciplinary review. Am J Econ. 2020;10(4),213-24.

Carr, A. (2020). COVID-19, indigenous peoples, and tourism: a view from New Zealand. Tourism Geographies, 1-12.

Darsono, D., Rohmana, J. A., & Busro, B. (2020). Against COVID-19 Pandemic: Bibliometric Assessment of World Scholars' International Publications related to COVID-19. Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia, 5(1), 75-89.

Elsevier. (2020a). Call for paper on the special issue: Safety and CoVid-19. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/safety-science/call-for-papers/call-for-paper-on-the-special-issue-safety-and-covid-19.

Elsevier. (2020b). COVID-19 Pandemic And Urban Policy. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/cities/call-for-papers/covid-19-pandemic-and-urban-policy

Escap U, UPU, World Health Organization. How COVID-19 is Changing the world: a statistical perspective. 2020. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ccsa/documents/.

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342.

Fan, J., Gao, Y., Zhao, N., Dai, R., Zhang, H., Feng, X., ... & Bao, S. (2020). Bibliometric analysis on COVID-19: A comparison of research between English and Chinese studies. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 477.

Fonkou MDM, Yacouba A. Global research trend in the treatment of the new Coronavirus diseases (COVID-19): bibliometric analysis. Med Rxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.13.20122762.

Head, M. G. (2020). A real-time policy dashboard can aid global transparency in the response to coronavirus disease 2019. International Health, 12(5), 373-374.

Hoffman, G. J., Webster, N. J., & Bynum, J. P. (2020). A Framework for Aging-Friendly Services and Supports in the Age of COVID-19. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1-10.

United Nations. (2020). Everyone Included: Social Impact of COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/everyone-included-covid-19.html.

Jelilov, G., Iorember, P. T., Usman, O., & Yua, P. M. (2020). Testing the nexus between stock market returns and inflation in Nigeria: Does the effect of COVID‐19 pandemic matter?. Journal of Public Affairs, e2289.

Kunzmann, K. R. (2020). Smart Cities After Covid-19: Ten Narratives. disP-The Planning Review, 56(2), 20-31.

Lee MR, Chen TT. Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: From 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Systems. 2012;28,47-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.11.016.

Lou, J., Tian, S. J., Niu, S. M., Kang, X. Q., Lian, H. X., Zhang, L. X., & Zhang, J. J. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019: a bibliometric analysis and review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 24(6), 3411-21.

Mahomed, F. (2020). Addressing the Problem of Severe Underinvestment in Mental Health and Well-Being from a Human Rights Perspective. Health and Human Rights, 22(1), 35.

Maine, L. L. (2020). An Unparalleled Spirit of Collaboration Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 84(6).

Marcum, C. D. (2020). American Corrections System Response to COVID-19: an Examination of r

McLaren, H. J., Wong, K. R., Nguyen, K. N., & Mahamadachchi, K. N. D. (2020). Covid-19 and Women's Triple Burden: Vignettes from Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Australia. Social Sciences, 9(5), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050087.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS med, 6(7), e1000097.

Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 2016;106(1),213-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.

Phillips D, Turney J. Bibliometrics and UK science policy. Scientometrics. 1988;14(3-4),185-200.

Pineda, V. S., & Corburn, J. (2020). Disability, Urban Health Equity, and the Coronavirus Pandemic: Promoting Cities for All. Journal of Urban Health, 1-6.

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349.

Sa'ed HZ, Al-Jabi SW. Mapping the situation of research on coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): a preliminary bibliometric analysis during the early stage of the outbreak. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1),1-8 https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-020-05293-z.

Science Business. (2020). US, Canada, and Europe lead COVID-19 research funding – Science|Business data. Retrieved from https://sciencebusiness.net/covid-19/news-byte/us-canada-and-europe-lead-covid-19-research-funding-sciencebusiness-data.

Shamsi A, Mansourzadeh MJ, Ghazbani A, Khalagi K, Fahimfar N, Ostovar A. Contribution of Iran in COVID-19 studies: a bibliometrics analysis. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-020-00606-0.

Sullivan, R., Eckhouse, S., & Lewison, G. (2007). Using bibliometrics to inform cancer research policy and spending. Monitoring financial flows for health research, 67-78.

The New York Times. A timeline of the coronavirus pandemic. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/article/coronavirus-timeline.html.

Thompson, J. R., & Nygren, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and the Field of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Where Have We Been? Where Are We? Where Do We Go?. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 58(4), 257-261.

United Nations (UN). Covid-19 and human rights. We are all in this together. 2020. Available at:https://www.un.org/victimsofterrorism/sites/www.un.org.victimsofterrori sm/files/un -_ human_rights_and_covid_april_2020.pdf accessed on November 11, 2020.

United Nations. Everyone included: social impact of COVID-19. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/everyone-included-covid-19.html.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In measuring scholarly impact. Springer, Cham. 2014, 285-320. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.

Venable, G. T., Shepherd, B. A., Roberts, M. L., Taylor, D. R., Khan, N. R., & Klimo, P. (2014). An application of Bradford's law: identification of the core journals of pediatric neurosurgery and a regional comparison of citation density. Child's Nervous System, 30(10), 1717-1727.

Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261.

White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for information science, 49(4), 327-355.

Yang, C., Huang, C., & Su, J. (2020). A bibliometrics-based research framework for exploring policy evolution: A case study of China's information technology policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120116.

Zhao T, Wu Z. Citizen–State collaboration in combating COVID-19 in China: experiences and lessons from the perspective of co-production. Am Rev Public Adm. 2020;50(6-7),777-83.

Published
2022-04-06
How to Cite
Nguyen, T. T., Dinh-Hai Luong, Hong-Lien Nguyen, Thi-Phuong Thao Vu, & Hoai-Thu Nguyen. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Concerning Policy Issues in Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL), 2(2), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v2i2.97
Section
Articles