An Exploration of University Students' Experience Using UI-UX Based E-learning Platforms: Challenges and Recommendations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v5i2.360Keywords:
Ui Ux, Platform e-learning, Flexibility, Accessibility, UniversityAbstract
This study explores the optimization of User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) in e-learning platforms to enhance user engagement and satisfaction. Using a qualitative case study approach, observations and interviews were conducted to identify user challenges. The findings reveal that an intuitive UI and positive UX significantly improve the efficiency of online learning. However, issues such as server reliability and accessibility barriers for students with disabilities remain challenges. This study highlights the need for inclusive and responsive UI/UX design to foster an effective online learning ecosystem. Recommendations are provided for platform developers to address these shortcomings, ensuring a more accessible and seamless experience for students, educators, and administrators, particularly in higher education. The results serve as a foundation for further improvements in e-learning platform design and implementation.
Downloads
References
Al Jumroh, S. F., & Rumaf, N. (2021). E-learning As an Innovation Model for Disabilities (Defective Vision). Interaction: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 8(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikanbahasa.v8i1.903.
Alanazi, A. A., Frey, B. B., Niileksela, C., Lee, S. W., Nong, A., & Alharbi, F. (2020). The Role of Task Value and Technology Satisfaction in Student Performance in Graduate-Level Online Courses. TechTrends, 64(6), 922–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00501-8.
Almonte, R. G., Montiano, A. M., Cerequillo Salili, P. B., Garcia, L. M., Hipolito, R. R., & Fernando, A. H. (2024). User Experience on a Culture-Based Learning Management System: Students’ Perspective. 2024 12th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET), 452–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET60671.2024.10542770.
Amin, S., Uddin, M. I., Alarood, A. A., Mashwani, W. K., Alzahrani, A. O., & Alzahrani, H. A. (2024). An adaptable and personalized framework for top-N course recommendations in online learning. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56497-1.
Asri, F. H. M., Singh, D., Mansor, Z., & Norman, H. (2024). A Review of Cross-Cultural Design to Improve User Engagement for Learning Management System. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2024.02.007.
Aung, S. T., Funabiki, N., Aung, L. H., Kinari, S. A., Mentari, M., & Wai, K. H. (2024). A study of learning environment for initiating Flutter app development using Docker. Information (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15040191.
Awada, Imad Alex, Adina Magda Florea, and Alexandru Scafa-Udriște. 2024. A Virtual Case Presentation Platform: Protocol Study. Methods and Protocols, 7(2). doi: 10.3390/mps7020023.
Baharuddin, R., Singh, D., & Razali, R. (2013). Usability Dimensions for Mobile Applications-A Review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 11(9), 2225–2231. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4776.
Cajander, Å., Larusdottir, M., & Geiser, J. L. (2022). UX professionals’ learning and usage of UX methods in agile. Information and Software Technology, 151, 107005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107005.
Chen, S., Li, X., Liu, K., & Wang, X. (2023). Chatbot or human? The impact of online customer service on consumers’ purchase intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 40(11), 2186–2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21862.
Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment Strategies for Online Learning: Engagement and Authenticity. Canada: Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771992329.01.
Curum, B., & Khedo, K. K. (2021). Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: principles and theories. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6.
Faudzi, M. A., Cob, Z. C., Omar, R., Sharudin, S. A., & Ghazali, M. (2023). Investigating the User Interface Design Frameworks of Current Mobile Learning Applications: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010094.
Federman, J. E. (2019). Interruptions in online training and their effects on learning. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(5/6), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2018-0100.
Ferreira, B., Marques, S., Kalinowski, M., Lopes, H., & Barbosa, S. D. J. (2023). Lessons learned to improve the UX practices in agile projects involving data science and process automation. Information and Software Technology, 155, 107106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107106.
Hambrock, H., de Villiers, F., Power, R., Koole, M., Ahmed, M. A., Ellis, W., Karim, R. A., Kurubacak, G., El-Hussein, M. O., Ossiannilsson, E., Sharma, R., Sousa, M. J., & Wollin, U. (2022). Seamless learning in higher education 2(e-book). International Association for Mobile Learning and Power Learning Solutions. https://pressbooks.pub/seamlesslearning2/.
Han, J. H., & Finkelstein, A. (2013). Understanding the effects of professors’ pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students’ engagement and learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 65, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.002.
Hasani, L. M., Sensuse, D. I., Kautsarina, & Suryono, R. R. (2020). User-Centered Design of e-Learning User Interfaces: A Survey of the Practices. 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274623.
He, X., Liu, Q., & Jung, S. (2024). The Impact of Recommendation System on User Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010024.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2024). Panduan Program Bantuan Pengembangan dan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Digital. In Dikti. https://spada.kemdikbud.go.id/berita/penawaran-program-bantuan-pengembangan-dan-penyelenggaraan-pembelajaran-digital-tahun-2024-16.
Kotwal, R., Chauhan, G. S., & Ghosh, S. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities in Online Learning Amid COVID-19: A Study on Hearing–Speech Impaired Students of Jammu and Kashmir. Media Watch, 13(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911221086356.
Kraft, C. (2012). User Experience and Why It Matters. In User Experience Innovation. New York: Apress eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-4150-8.
Law, E. L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., & Kort, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518813.
Lei, S. I., Shen, H., & Ye, S. (2021). A comparison between chatbot and human service: customer perception and reuse intention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 3977–3995. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1399.
Leonnard, L. (2021). Exploring Relationship among E-Learning Platforms, Technical System Quality and Perceived Students’ Satisfaction on Higher Educations’ System for E-Learning. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan/ Journal of Theory and Applied Management, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v14i1.24183.
Littlefield, C., & Donovan, S. (2019). Fitting Flexibility Across the Curriculum. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes, 144–152. California: edtechbooks.org
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307.
Müller, C., Mildenberger, T., & Steingruber, D. (2023). Learning effectiveness of a flexible learning study programme in a blended learning design: why are some courses more effective than others? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00379-x.
Natda, K. V. (2013). Responsive web design. Eduvantage, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.11635/2319-9954/1/1/18.
Ovesleová, H., Posavec-Malok, D., Javůrková, J., Polášková, A., ěnička, J., Nikl, T., Fuglík, V., Švejda, V., & Moravcová, A. (2024). Learning Support System: A Practical Guide to E-learning at CU. https://publications.cuni.cz/handle/20.500.14178/2505.
Perez-Enriquez, Mario, Jose Luis Lopez-Cuadrado, and Israel Gonzalez-Carrasco. 2024. Platform for Accessible Online Learning. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, (9), 1-4. doi: 10.1145/3657242.3658603.
Pickering, M. (Ed.). (2008). Research methods for cultural studies. United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Poerwanti, S. D., Makmun, S., & Dewantara, A. D. (2024). Jalan Panjang Menuju Inklusi Digital bagi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Journal of Urban Sociology, 1(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v1i1.3536.
Riatun, R., & Alvin, S. (2023). Evaluasi pengalaman belajar mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh: studi kasus di umn. Academy of Education Journal, 14(2), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v14i2.1707.
Rodríguez-Galván, Lilia Carolina, Asad Abbas, Anil Yasin Ar, Beatriz Garza-González, and Patricia Esther Alonso-Galicia. 2024. Do Sentiments of Professors Feedback Change after Migrating from In-Person to Online Modalities? Pre- and during COVID-19 Experience. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(3), 1193–1202. doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00943-2.
Stephani, N., Alvin, S., & Riatun. (2023). Exploring college students’ motivations for choosing online learning program. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2266206.
Sullivan, Clare C., Daire M. O’Leary, Fiona M. Boland, Claire M. Condron, Claire M. Mulhall, and Walter J. Eppich. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Student, Educator, and Simulated Parent Ratings of Video-Recorded Medical Student Consultations in Pediatrics. Advances in Simulation, 9(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00282-7.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supanji, T. H. (2023). Pemerintah Penuhi Hak Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kemenko PMK. https://www.kemenkopmk.go.id/pemerintah-penuhi-hak-penyandang-disabilitas-di-indonesia.
Taat, M. S., & Francis, A. (2019). Factors Influencing the Students’ Acceptance of E-Learning at Teacher Education Institute: An Exploratory Study in Malaysia. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p133.
Universitas Terbuka. (2023). Sejarah UT Tentang UT. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. https://www.ut.ac.id/sejarah-ut/.
Van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2009). The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.012.
Yalcin, M. E., & Kutlu, B. (2019). Examination of students’ acceptance of and intention to use learning management systems using extended TAM. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2414–2432. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12798.
